It is a small moment of grace, but one I was happy Harry had been allowed to have after losing his parents and taking on the daunting responsibility of destroying their murderer, Voldemort.Ĩ. At that moment Harry realizes, that in his own stunted way, Dudley has been trying to thank him ever since their mutual encounter with the soul-sucking dementors a year prior. In the book, Harry actually shakes hands with his cousin Dudley before saying goodbye to him for what is likely the last time. One change that did bother me, and it is minute in the scheme of things, was that in the movie Harry had no real resolution to the years of emotional abuse heaped on him by the Dursleys. I felt that some of the characters were actually more well-rounded in the movie, particularly secondary characters like Minister of Magic Scrimgouer and Aunt Muriel (the Weasley-matriarch and resident battle-axe) who both come off in the movie as more reasonable and less like mere caricatures or foils. This one wasn’t like that at all.”Ĭould it be: one person’s “boring middle” is another’s “refreshing change of pace”?įor the most part, we liked or accepted the departures from the book. ![]() “My parents stopped taking me to the Harry Potter movies in the theater because they found them too loud. “It was actually a lot more quiet than the other movies,” remarked another panel member. “Not over-the-top scary, like Prisoner of Azkaban,” one panelist noted. To sum: the scene was a tad too intense for my preference, though I have no doubt it was a realistic-enough depiction of a young man's aching neurosis. My discomfort-o-meter ratcheted into warning territory as I realized that while all relevant parts were thoroughly enshrouded in dream-fog, the implication by the scene’s close was that the glittery, torrid embrace between Harry and Hermione was taking place without clothes. The scene in question, part of a living-nightmare sequence for Ron, involves a kiss between Harry and Hermione that in interviews Daniel Radcliffe described as both “vigorous” and “ like kissing an animal.” In this viewer’s assessment…erm…this is not hyperbole. ![]() “I think the last pieces of my childhood exploded into ashes at that point,” another panelist sighed contentedly. One of my tween compatriots wanted to make sure that parents were forewarned about the intensity of a kiss that takes place towards the end of the movie-and the rest of my panel immediately concurred-though some panelists clearly remembered the scene with great fondness, as well. And everyone else really needs him around in order to keep trying.” “It is almost like Harry is about the action and Hermione is the brains, but Ron is the heart of their team. However, the real honors went to Rupert Grint’s Ron Weasley: “Anytime he was on the screen, he warmed it up," my sole female reviewer claimed. Helena Bonham Carter's Bellatrix LeStrange was deemed horribly insane (“But I couldn’t take my eyes off of her”) and Dobby the House Elf was greeted like an old friend (“I missed him!”). “It was a really good story-within-the-story, but at the same time, I sat there thinking ‘how did they imagine that? Could I do something that looked that cool?’ I liked that experience.”Īdditionally, a Ministry of Magic courtroom scene with hovering dementors was pronounced “extremely creepy” while a scene early on with seven identical Harry Potters was revisited with lots of laughter. “It looked very Tim Burton-like,” one panel member gushed. The animated reenactment of "( "Wikipage "The Tale of the Three Brothers"")" and the deathly hallows of the title was unanimously admired. However, this particular installment of the story has occasionally been criticized for not having as much action as its hyper-kinetic counterparts-has even been accused of draggingin places-though, not by my review team, who summarized their feelings about the movie in broadly positive terms: “Brilliant!” “Beautifully filmed!” “It grabbed me in right from the very beginning!” ![]() When you weave together a cast of such Dickensian numbers, the overall emotional effect can still be one of richness and depth… This is not to say that I haven’t found each of the movies varying shades of deeply-enjoyable. It seemed that in the films, each character was permitted to express only one emotion or trait-for Harry, it was stoicism for Hermione, an intelligent, pedantic resourcefulness for Snape, a love affair with the baleful, lingering glance for the Weasley twins, rambunctious good humor, etc. One of my main criticisms of the "Harry Potter" movie franchise has been that the films have often sacrificed character development at the claw-footed altar of frenetic action sequences-particularly as the books became longer and more politically-nuanced.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |